On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 11:43 AM Alexander Korotkov
<aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 11:05 AM Alexander Korotkov
> <aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 12:06 AM Alvaro Herrera
> > <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > > On 2019-Mar-21, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> > >
> > > > However, I think this still can be backpatched correctly. We can
> > > > determine whether xlog record data contains deleteXid by its size.
> > > > See the attached patch. I haven't test this yet. I'm going to test
> > > > it. If OK, then push.
> > >
> > > Wow, this is so magical that I think it merits a long comment explaining
> > > what is going on.
> >
> > Yeah, have to fo magic to fix such weird things :)
> > Please, find next revision of patch attached. It uses static
> > assertion to check that data structure size has changed. Also,
> > assertion checks that record data length match on of structures
> > length.
>
> I'm going to backpatch this on no objections.
So, pushed.
------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company