Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alexander Korotkov
Тема Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold.
Дата
Msg-id CAPpHfdsd5uduNTSyGOroo7b6ZEATUzF8VH1-L6KWQU46ZNa=Bg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold.  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold.  (Darafei "Komяpa" Praliaskouski <me@komzpa.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 1:46 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 6:55 PM, Alexander Korotkov
> <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> > So, I propose to just
> > increase maximum value for both GUC and reloption.  See the attached
> > patch.  It also changes calculations _bt_vacuum_needs_cleanup() for
> > better handling of large values (just some kind of overflow paranoia).
>
> The patch looks good to me.

Pushed, thanks!

------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Concurrency bug in UPDATE of partition-key
Следующее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Thinko/typo in ExecSimpleRelationInsert