Re: BUG #16583: merge join on tables with different DB collation behind postgres_fdw fails

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Etsuro Fujita
Тема Re: BUG #16583: merge join on tables with different DB collation behind postgres_fdw fails
Дата
Msg-id CAPmGK14_wG5L9wmrCNyO2jEhpr7BDveOn4hK0TaQTboZsM-r_g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: BUG #16583: merge join on tables with different DB collation behind postgres_fdw fails  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 5:42 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 4:17 AM Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 1:41 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >>> Seems to just need an update of the expected-file to account for test
> >>> cases added recently.  (I take no position on whether the new results
> >>> are desirable; some of these might be breaking the intent of the case.
> >>> But this should quiet the cfbot anyway.)
>
> >> The test case was added by commit "Add support for asynchronous execution"
> >> "27e1f14563cf982f1f4d71e21ef247866662a052" by Etsuro Fujita. He can comment
> >> whether the new results are desirable or not.
>
> > The new results aren't what I intended.  I'll update the patch to
> > avoid that by modifying the original test cases properly, if there are
> > no objections.
>
> Please follow up on that sometime?

Will do in this commitfest.

> In the meantime, here is a rebase
> over aa769f80e and 2dc53fe2a, to placate the cfbot.

Thanks for the rebase!

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com"
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: Failed transaction statistics to measure the logical replication progress
Следующее
От: Greg Nancarrow
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side