On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> (2) It seems like there are still a few big questions about this commit:
>> - Is it wanted at the moment? It didn't seem like there's a
>> consensus about whether or not this enhancement should be
>> merged, even if the patch is pretty minimal.
>> - It seems like there are two competing patch
>> sets in play for this enhancement: Joy's and
>> Peter's. Presumably at most one of them would
>> be merged.
>
> These are things that reviews should be helping to decide. It's probably
> a squishier topic than some patches, but if you're interested, feel free
> to read code and weigh in.
Thanks. It sounds like worst-case scenario, I perform an unneeded
review. I'll give it a shot.