Re: Add backup_type to pg_stat_progress_basebackup
От | Shinya Kato |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Add backup_type to pg_stat_progress_basebackup |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAOzEurRm9E5pCQgJq7fBRJetVCfZL9r3RHp75DvhhxUa=BG=Bg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Add backup_type to pg_stat_progress_basebackup (Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: Add backup_type to pg_stat_progress_basebackup
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 6:06 PM Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp> wrote: > > On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 17:48:35 +0900 > Shinya Kato <shinya11.kato@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi hackers, > > > > Starting with PostgreSQL 17, pg_basebackup supports incremental > > backups. However, the pg_stat_progress_basebackup view doesn't > > currently show the backup type (i.e., whether it's a full or > > incremental backup). > > > > Therefore, I propose adding a backup_type column to this view. While > > this information is available in pg_stat_activity, the backup type is > > important for monitoring the progress of pg_basebackup, and including > > it directly in the progress view would be very useful. > > > > Thoughts? > > That seems reasonable to me. > > Just one minor comment on the patch: > > + > + <row> > + <entry role="catalog_table_entry"><para role="column_definition"> > + <structfield>backup_type</structfield> <type>bigint</type> > + </para> > + <para> > + Backup type. Either <literal>full</literal> or > + <literal>incremental</literal>. > + </para></entry> > + </row> > > The type should be text rather than bigint. Thank you for the review. I made a careless mistake. Fixed. -- Best regards, Shinya Kato NTT OSS Center
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: