On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 21:57 Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 09:47:47PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 21:35 Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > I normally link to only the _first_ mention of something, and since they > are both in the same section, I didn't add a link for the second one. > Adding a second link might suggest that there is more information > available, even though the coarseness of our links means that section is > the same. > > Perhaps the wording would be better as something like: > > New <a href=“…”>predefined roles</a> for granting access to read/write all > tables have been added, called pg_read_all_data and pg_write_all_data ..? > > Or something along those lines?
I have avoided doing that since the link is about the roles, not about the term "predefined roles".
I tend to agree that it’s about the roles, but it isn’t about just one of them …
> Just a thought. > > Perhaps another idea would be to make one link which includes both names.
Uh, that is going to look odd, I am afraid.
This thread started with the point that the current entry looks odd. I’m not sure this would look more odd than what is there now.