Re: For a LAPP setup what is better: 1 fast or 2 slower machines

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Scott Marlowe
Тема Re: For a LAPP setup what is better: 1 fast or 2 slower machines
Дата
Msg-id CAOR=d=2t_gcZKu05yR6-Pv6n3Xynpuf=x7-maw5L9-J+H5foVg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на For a LAPP setup what is better: 1 fast or 2 slower machines  (Alexander Farber <alexander.farber@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: For a LAPP setup what is better: 1 fast or 2 slower machines  (Alexander Farber <alexander.farber@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Alexander Farber
<alexander.farber@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm running a CentOS 5.6 / 64 bit Linux
> with PostgreSQL 8.4.8 and Drupal 7.4
> on a 4GB quad-CPU machine.
>
> In Autumn I can change my hoster
> and for EUR 100 can either take
>
> 1) 2 machines with i7-920 Quad-Core
>   8 GB RAM, 2 x 750 GB SATA-II HDD
>   (Software-RAID 1)
>
> or
>
> 2) 1 machine i7-980X Hexa-Core
>     24 GB RAM, 1 x 1,5 TB SATA II
>
> What would you prefer?

2 machines for two reasons.  1: separating out app from db server
means it's way easier to figure out which is acting up should you have
a performance problem.  2: the dual machines have RAID-1 hard drives,
the single machine just has one big 1.5TB drive.  No way would I run a
production system on a single drive, especially considering how cheap
hard drives are nowadays.

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Rodrigo Gonzalez
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: No suitable driver found for jdbc:postgresql [error]
Следующее
От: Alexander Farber
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: For a LAPP setup what is better: 1 fast or 2 slower machines