Re: BUG #15572: Misleading message reported by "Drop functionoperation" on DB with functions having same name

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Julien Rouhaud
Тема Re: BUG #15572: Misleading message reported by "Drop functionoperation" on DB with functions having same name
Дата
Msg-id CAOBaU_bzP+8nmSaidDtkVBji8hxuXKwGHxjJ7yPRCYD4r-Sovw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: BUG #15572: Misleading message reported by "Drop function operation" on DB with functions having same name  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: BUG #15572: Misleading message reported by "Drop functionoperation" on DB with functions having same name  (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-bugs
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 5:46 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> writes:
> >
> > Extensions calling those functions with old true/false values probably
> > won't get any warning or error during compile.  Is is something we
> > should worry about or is it enough to keep the same behavior in this
> > case?
>
> Yeah, I thought about that.  We can avoid such problems by assigning
> the enum values such that 0 and 1 correspond to the old behaviors.
> I didn't look to see if the proposed patch does it like that right
> now, but it should be an easy fix if not.

It does, I was just wondering whether that was a good enough solution.

Thinking more about it, I'm not sure if there's a general policy for
enums, but should we have an AssertArg() in LookupFuncName[WithArgs]
to check that a correct value was passed?


В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andre Piwoni
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #15638: pg_basebackup with --wal-method=stream incorrectlygenerates WAL segment created during backup
Следующее
От: Andre Piwoni
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #15638: pg_basebackup with --wal-method=stream incorrectlygenerates WAL segment created during backup