On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 2:51 PM Daniel Westermann (DWE)
<daniel.westermann@dbi-services.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 10:58 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 03:28:45PM +0000, Daniel Westermann (DWE) wrote:
> >> > I was playing a bit with trusted extensions and wondered if there is
> >> > a reason that the "trusted" flag is not exposed in pg_available_extensions.
> >> > I believe that information would be quite useful so one can easily
> >> > identify extensions that can be installed as "normal" user.
> >>
> >> Adding the trusted flag makes sense for visibility. There is a bit
> >> more that we could consider though? For example, what about
> >> "relocatable" and "requires"?
>
> >+1, and also the schema (for non relocatable extensions).
So, apparently pg_available_extension_versions already had those
fields so all the required infrastructure was already there. I just
added the exact same fields to pg_available_extensions, see attached
patch.