Re: VACUUM FREEZE vs plain VACUUM
| От | Ron Johnson |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: VACUUM FREEZE vs plain VACUUM |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CANzqJaA6SPoy7ozSH3RQfJkRF1VTVwOYPmiBqH3p3cSb51tPng@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: VACUUM FREEZE vs plain VACUUM ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: VACUUM FREEZE vs plain VACUUM
|
| Список | pgsql-admin |
On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 6:26 PM David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, July 17, 2025, Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com> wrote:Does VACUUM FREEZE do something extra or special than to defer autovacuum for an extra 50,000,000 transactions?It effectively resets the pseudo-counter(s) that autovacuum uses to determine when next it should perform an aggressive scan. Or, put differently, it does exactly what autovacuum would do when the pseudo-counter(s) hit their thresholds. The act of doing that thing effectively resets said counters to zero at that moment (absent concurrent activity).
That seems to be what I said. Or am I still missing something?
Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce.
Don't boil me, I'm still alive.
<Redacted> lobster!
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: