> Yes, I pushed the document_overhead_by_track_planning.patch, but this > CF entry is for pgss_lwlock_v1.patch which replaces spinlocks with lwlocks > in pg_stat_statements. The latter patch has not been committed yet. > Probably attachding the different patches in the same thread would cause > this confusing thing... Anyway, thanks for your comment!
To avoid further confusion, I attached the rebased version of the patch that was registered at CF. I'd appreciate it if you review this version.
Thank you. Reviewing it now.
Regards,
-- Fujii Masao Advanced Computing Technology Center Research and Development Headquarters NTT DATA CORPORATION