Re: Minor revision downgrade (9.2.11 -> 9.2.10)
I hate to ask the obvious, but have you made sure you copied over the postgresql.conf and pg_hba.conf to make it identical?
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 7:39 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 04:40:15PM +1200, Fabio Ugo Venchiarutti wrote:
> We're fairly confident that it's an issue with the hardware but we
> have political reasons to downgrade PG to 9.2.10 to show the hosting
> supplier that it's their fault.
>
>
> The release notes for 9.2.11 mention no data structure changes (in
> line with the usual PG versioning policy). Is it just as safe to
> downgrade too? We tested it on a couple non-critical boxes to no ill
> effect whatsoever, but we'd like a second opinion before we do it on
> the live installation too.
I have rarely seen this question asked. I think minor-release
downgrading is fine in this case.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
--
Melvin Davidson
I reserve the right to fantasize. Whether or not you
wish to share my fantasy is entirely up to you.
I reserve the right to fantasize. Whether or not you
wish to share my fantasy is entirely up to you.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:
Предыдущее
От: Jan de VisserДата:
Сообщение: Re: advocating LTS release and feature-train release cycles