Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication

On Sat, 13 Jun 2026 at 15:47, Dilip Kumar  wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 5:53 PM vignesh C  wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 11 Jun 2026 at 10:44, Dilip Kumar  wrote:
> > >
> > > Please find the rebased patch
> > > 1. It includes the new 0005 patch for reporting errors for DDLs on clt.
> > >
> > > Open comments:
> > > 1. Recent comments from Nisha and Shveta after v47 are still open
> > > 2. Vignesh's patch for "describe related" changes needs a rebase. Can
> > > you do that, Vignesh? Meanwhile, I will close all the open comments
> > > and try to share a new version by EOD today.
> >
> > Here is the rebased version of the patch attached.
>
> Please find attached the latest patch. I have reordered the series,
> moving 0006 to 0002, and updated the lock restrictions. We now allow
> ACCESS SHARE mode exclusively to ensure pg_dump can acquire its
> necessary locks, while blocking higher-level locks to prevent
> interference with insertions into the conflict log tables.
Hi Dilip and Vignesh,

I checked the Cfbot and noticed that one of the 'CompilerWarnings' [1]
flow is failing with:
describe.c: In function 'describeSubscriptions':
describe.c:7456:29: error: 'logdest' may be used uninitialized
[-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
7456 | if (strcmp(logdest, "table") == 0 || strcmp(logdest, "all") == 0)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
describe.c:7356:29: note: 'logdest' was declared here
7356 | char *logdest;
| ^~~~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors

[1]: https://github.com/postgresql-cfbot/postgresql/actions/runs/27464417110/job/81184175578

Thanks,
Shlok Kyal