Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От shveta malik
Тема Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication
Дата
Msg-id CAJpy0uA3sHqOJWKSHK5yEn310GRCwjob=gqpZOZ4hv0eHC+csQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 4:57 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Thanks, it looks good. For the benefit of others, could you include a
> > brief note, perhaps in the commit message for now, describing how to
> > access or read this array column? We can remove it later.
>
> Thanks, okay, temporarily I have added in a commit message how we can
> fetch the data from the JSON array field.  In next version I will add
> a test to get the conflict stored in conflict log history table and
> fetch from it.
>

Thanks, I have not looked at the patch in detail yet, but a few things:

1)
Assert is hit here:
 LOG:  logical replication apply worker for subscription "sub1" has started
TRAP: failed Assert("slot != NULL"), File: "conflict.c", Line: 669, PID: 137604

Steps: create table tab1 (i int primary key, j int);
Pub: insert into tab1 values(10,10); insert into tab1 values(20,10);
Sub:  delete from tab1 where i=10;
Pub:  delete from tab1 where i=10;

2)
I see that key_tuple still points to RI and there is no RI field
added. It seems that discussion at [1] is missed in this patch.

[1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1L3umixUUik7Ef1eU%3Dx-JMb8iXD7rWWExBMP4dmOGTS9A%40mail.gmail.com

thanks
Shveta



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: