Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dilip Kumar
Тема Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication
Дата
Msg-id CAFiTN-tddmj=URKbUe=-nV_AKs9gFer1N1ivEne498Se9Tz5oA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication  (shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication
Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Aug 8, 2025 at 8:58 AM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2025 at 3:08 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > So logically for PostgreSQL its an
> > user table but yeah this is created and managed by the extension.
> >
>
> Any idea if the user can alter/drop or perform any DML on it? I could
> not find any details on this part.

In my experience, for such extension managed tables where we want them
to behave like catalog, generally users are just granted with SELECT
permission.  So although it is not a catalog but for accessibility
wise for non admin users it is like a catalog.  IMHO, even if we
choose to create a user table for conflict log history we can also
control the permissions similarly.  What's your opinion on this?

--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
Google



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: