Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication
| От | Dilip Kumar |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAFiTN-uh8jyM-a_VTdRN2kxVBG2z-3wbCRY9qN3Tizu3q=DR2g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 4:06 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 1:59 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On a separate note, I've been considering how to manage conflict log > insertions when an error causes the outer transaction to abort, which > seems to be a non-trivial. > > Here is what I have in mind: > ====================== > First, prepare_conflict_log() would be executed from > ReportApplyConflict(). This function would handle all preliminary > work, such as preparing the tuple for the conflict log table. Second, > insert_conflict_log() would be executed. If the error level in > ReportApplyConflict() is LOG, the insertion would occur directly. > Otherwise, the log information would be stored in a global variable > and inserted in a separate transaction once we exit start_apply() due > to the error. > > @shveta malik @Amit Kapila let me know what you think? Or do you > think it can be simplified? While digging more into this I am wondering why CT_MULTIPLE_UNIQUE_CONFLICTS is reported as an error and all other conflicts as LOG? -- Regards, Dilip Kumar Google
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: