Re: Correct comment wording in extension.c
| От | John Naylor |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Correct comment wording in extension.c |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CANWCAZYgLtgwKFvwe+sGaN-r8-65DxnQctREuk=VDLbfg=X4XA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Correct comment wording in extension.c (albert tan <alterttan1223@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Correct comment wording in extension.c
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 7, 2026 at 1:13 PM albert tan <alterttan1223@gmail.com> wrote: > I believe: > 'will be searched' is better than 'will be search'. > 'it assumes' is better than 'it assume'. Those are indeed grammatical errors. From a quick eyeball scan, this file has other wording issues: /* * Ignore already-found names. They are not reachable by the * path search, so don't shown them. */ "show" /* * The directory parameter can be omitted, absolute, or relative to the * installation's base directory, which can be the sharedir or a custom * path that it was set extension_control_path. It depends where the * .control file was found. */ I imagine this means "or a custom path that was set via extension_control_path". /* * Return a list of directories declared on extension_control_path GUC. */ I would guess this normally phrased something like "Return the list of directories in extension_control_path". -- John Naylor Amazon Web Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: