Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes
Дата
Msg-id CANP8+jJTADnufZjZ9gMqkaV1mgn_6VHmLJj7Gg3YepOvujmKWg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes  (Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes  (Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru>)
Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes  (Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru>)
Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 13 September 2017 at 11:30, Konstantin Knizhnik
<k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru> wrote:

> The only reason of all this discussion about terms is that I need to choose
> name for correspondent index option.
> Simon think that we do not need this option at all. In this case we should
> not worry about right term.
> From my point of view, "projection" is quite clear notion and not only for
> mathematics. It is also widely used in IT and especially in DBMSes.

If we do have an option it won't be using fancy mathematical
terminology at all, it would be described in terms of its function,
e.g. recheck_on_update

Yes, I'd rather not have an option at all, just some simple code with
useful effect, like we have in many other places.

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Arseny Sher
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] DROP SUBSCRIPTION hangs if sub is disabled in the same transaction
Следующее
От: Rushabh Lathia
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] GatherMerge misses to push target list