Re: A Modest Upgrade Proposal

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: A Modest Upgrade Proposal
Дата
Msg-id CANP8+jJ3HHSxUSWv0x3RhjdrQH_EPqDKTXOAaOF4op0CoAC9Dw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: A Modest Upgrade Proposal  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Ответы Re: A Modest Upgrade Proposal  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 8 July 2016 at 00:48, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
On 07/07/2016 01:10 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 8:52 PM, David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
In light of the above, it is perfectly reasonable to require, at least
temporarily, setting up duplicate storage, or another node.

pg_upgrade does that, kinda.  I'd like to have something better, but
in the absence of that, I think it's quite wrong to think about
deprecating it, even if we had logical replication fully integrated
into core today.  Which we by no means do.

I would much rather see more brain power put into pg_upgrade or in place upgrades than logical replication (as a upgrade solution).

Why is that?
 
--
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Issue with bgworker, SPI and pgstat_report_stat
Следующее
От: "Joshua D. Drake"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: A Modest Upgrade Proposal