Re: [HACKERS] The case for removing replacement selection sort

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: [HACKERS] The case for removing replacement selection sort
Дата
Msg-id CANP8+jJ1Br8yd9MaiuyZE75MdpE4L7ndpfg2Z8H59y0BJOfOjQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на [HACKERS] The case for removing replacement selection sort  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] The case for removing replacement selection sort  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 14 July 2017 at 23:20, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:

> I think we should remove the replacement_sort_tuples GUC, and kill
> replacement selection entirely. There is no need to do this for
> Postgres 10. I don't feel very strongly about it. It just doesn't make
> sense to continue to support replacement selection.

Forgive me if I missed the explanation, but how will we handle bounded sorts?

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ashutosh Bapat
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers
Следующее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes