Re: Doubt about AccessExclusiveLock in ALTER TABLE .. SET ( .. );

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: Doubt about AccessExclusiveLock in ALTER TABLE .. SET ( .. );
Дата
Msg-id CANP8+j+wwvGvXgRHmuwEUymhAGXY1+ZC8SMu+u6kvK9OwsPsQg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Doubt about AccessExclusiveLock in ALTER TABLE .. SET ( .. );  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Doubt about AccessExclusiveLock in ALTER TABLE .. SET ( .. );  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
On 31 July 2015 at 02:46, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
 
> Added. I really don't know if my isolation tests are completely correct, is
> my first time writing this kind of tests.

This patch size has increased from 16k to 157k because of the output
of the isolation tests you just added. 

That's too much.

Why do we need more isolation tests? There isn't anything critical here, its just different lock levels for ALTER TABLE. A few normal regression tests are fine for this. 

--
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Doubt about AccessExclusiveLock in ALTER TABLE .. SET ( .. );
Следующее
От: Petr Jelinek
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: creating extension including dependencies