Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: GetOldestXminExtend for ignoring arbitraryvacuum flags

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: GetOldestXminExtend for ignoring arbitraryvacuum flags
Дата
Msg-id CANP8+j+WqPx4pbD==Dr6NjVQfDwSZ_is5u5=+YDOsrLU722yTA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: GetOldestXminExtend for ignoring arbitrary vacuum flags  ("Seki, Eiji" <seki.eiji@jp.fujitsu.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: GetOldestXminExtend for ignoring arbitraryvacuum flags  ("Seki, Eiji" <seki.eiji@jp.fujitsu.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 16 February 2017 at 05:24, Seki, Eiji <seki.eiji@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Please persuade us with measurements that allowing this impact on
>> ANALYZE would really improve performance at least in your case, and
>> also examine the effect of this on the accuracy and usefulness of the
>> gathered statistics.
>
> I explain results of the test that Haribabu mentioned in [1].

Thanks for the tests. I can see the performance is affected by this.


> Please let me know if you need any further information.

...you didn't comment at all on the accuracy and usefulness of the
gathered statistics, when the sample is biased towards non-updated
data.

I'm wondering whether this should be an additional table-level option.

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Enabling parallelism for queries coming from SQL orother PL functions
Следующее
От: Ashutosh Sharma
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Should we cacheline align PGXACT?