On 3 January 2017 at 23:22, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>> I don't see why that would be unacceptable. If we do it for
>> remote_apply, why not also do it for other modes? Whatever the
>> reasoning was for remote_apply should work for other modes. I should
>> add it was originally designed to be that way by me, so must have been
>> changed later.
>
> You can achieve that with this patch by setting
> replication_lag_sample_interval to 0.
I wonder why you ignore my mention of the bug in the correct mechanism?
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services