Re: User defined data types in Logical Replication

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 7:57 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Attached an updated test patch added the above test(0002 patch). Since
> for this test case it's enough to use existing test functions I didn't
> create new test functions. Also I found that the local data type name
> in log for data type conversion isn't qualified whereas the remote
> data type is always qualified. Attached 0001 patch fixes that.
>

The original issue has been fixed and this entry on CommitFest has
been marked as "Committed" but there are still works for improving
testing. Perhaps I should register a new entry of remaining patches to
next CommitFest.