Re: Speed up COPY FROM text/CSV parsing using SIMD
От | Nazir Bilal Yavuz |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Speed up COPY FROM text/CSV parsing using SIMD |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAN55FZ0houfWHn8_MEEefhprZvc33jr07GrBYo+Bp2yw=TVnKA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Speed up COPY FROM text/CSV parsing using SIMD (KAZAR Ayoub <ma_kazar@esi.dz>) |
Ответы |
Re: Speed up COPY FROM text/CSV parsing using SIMD
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On Thu, 14 Aug 2025 at 05:25, KAZAR Ayoub <ma_kazar@esi.dz> wrote: > > Following Nazir's findings about 4096 bytes being the performant line length, I did more benchmarks from my side on bothTEXT and CSV formats with two different cases of normal data (no special characters) and data with many special characters. > > Results are con good as expected and similar to previous benchmarks > ~30.9% faster copy in TEXT format > ~32.4% faster copy in CSV format > 20%-30% reduces cycles per instructions > > In the case of doing a lot of special characters in the lines (e.g., tables with large numbers of columns maybe), we obviouslyexpect regressions here because of the overhead of many fallbacks to scalar processing. > Results for a 1/3 of line length of special characters: > ~43.9% slower copy in TEXT format > ~16.7% slower copy in CSV format > So for even less occurrences of special characters or wider distance between there might still be some regressions in thiscase, a non-significant case maybe, but can be treated in other patches if we consider to not use SIMD path sometimes. > > I hope this helps more and confirms the patch. Thanks for running that benchmark! Would you mind sharing a reproducer for the regression you observed? -- Regards, Nazir Bilal Yavuz Microsoft
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: