On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 10:08 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> I think there could be value in having both a strictly focused planet
> and a more broader one. But I wouldn't want to *replace* the former by
> the latter.
It is interesting, but the policy about "postgres-relevant" helps
avoid conflicts about content of other types. I don't want to get more
into the business of fielding questions about appropriateness of
content on a more general feed, or censoring inappropriate content.
Or, honestly, defining what appropriate would be on a broader planet.
Seems like an epic bikeshedding opportunity.
-selena
--
http://chesnok.com