On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 07:34, Selena Deckelmann <selena@chesnok.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 10:08 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
>
>> I think there could be value in having both a strictly focused planet
>> and a more broader one. But I wouldn't want to *replace* the former by
>> the latter.
A separate feed would be a *requirement* if we wanted to do this,
IMHO. The current feed is syndicated on the frontpage of the main
website, we certainly want to keep that content PostgreSQL-centric..
> It is interesting, but the policy about "postgres-relevant" helps
> avoid conflicts about content of other types. I don't want to get more
> into the business of fielding questions about appropriateness of
> content on a more general feed, or censoring inappropriate content.
> Or, honestly, defining what appropriate would be on a broader planet.
>
> Seems like an epic bikeshedding opportunity.
+1(00000).
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/