Re: [BDR] vs pgpool-II v3

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Craig Ringer
Тема Re: [BDR] vs pgpool-II v3
Дата
Msg-id CAMsr+YHsgrg=nDW5U4wC44Hnc1ns-wXJzU3HgQhsp_jkQqrG7g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на [BDR] vs pgpool-II v3  ("Wayne E. Seguin" <wayneeseguin@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [BDR] vs pgpool-II v3
Список pgsql-general
On 13 August 2015 at 23:52, Wayne E. Seguin <wayneeseguin@gmail.com> wrote:

> The context of this is using BDR to implement a HA solution where we  have
> one node getting all connections at a time, if the node fails we move all
> connections to another node. (eg. only one node gets all connections at any
> given time).

This sounds like a job better suited to a normal active/standby
configuration with regular built-in streaming replication. Use a tool
like repmgr to manage failover and a proxy like pgbouncer to redirect
traffic.

There's no reason to use async multi-master replication when simple
single-master replication will do just as well.

--
 Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Deepak Balasubramanyam
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Postgresql jsonb
Следующее
От: Jony Cohen
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: repmgr won't update witness after failover