Re: [HACKERS] Walsender timeouts and large transactions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Craig Ringer
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Walsender timeouts and large transactions
Дата
Msg-id CAMsr+YHNcsTQMUkDcZOyghQWHB278L8idF4wz+g+JpEu=oiDYA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Walsender timeouts and large transactions  (Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Walsender timeouts and large transactions  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 7 December 2017 at 01:22, Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
On 05/12/17 21:07, Robert Haas wrote:

> Generally we write if (a && b) { ... } not if (a) { if (b) .. }
>

It's rather ugly with && because one of the conditions is two line, but
okay here you go. I am keeping the brackets even if normally don't for
one-liners because it's completely unreadable without them IMHO.


 
Yeah, that's why I passed on that FWIW. Sometimes breaking up a condition is nice. Personally I intensely dislike the convention of 


if (big_condition
    && big_condition)
   one_linerdo_something;


as awfully unreadable, but I guess code convention means you live with things you don't like.
 

Anyway, I've just hit this bug in the wild for the umpteenth time this year, and I'd like to know what I can do to help progress it to commit+backport.

--
 Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Justin Pryzby
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade failed with error - ERROR: column "a" inchild table must be marked NOT NULL
Следующее
От: Ashutosh Bapat
Дата:
Сообщение: procedures and plpgsql PERFORM