Re: [HACKERS] Walsender timeouts and large transactions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andrew Dunstan
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Walsender timeouts and large transactions
Дата
Msg-id 1a1af442-8f72-f8d6-25d6-fd8d01dd4eaf@2ndQuadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Walsender timeouts and large transactions  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Walsender timeouts and large transactions  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers

On 12/14/2017 01:46 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 7 December 2017 at 01:22, Petr Jelinek
> <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com <mailto:petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>>
> wrote:
>
>     On 05/12/17 21:07, Robert Haas wrote:
>     > 
>     > Generally we write if (a && b) { ... } not if (a) { if (b) .. }
>     >
>
>     It's rather ugly with && because one of the conditions is two
>     line, but
>     okay here you go. I am keeping the brackets even if normally don't for
>     one-liners because it's completely unreadable without them IMHO.
>
>
>  
> Yeah, that's why I passed on that FWIW. Sometimes breaking up a
> condition is nice. Personally I intensely dislike the convention of 
>
>
> if (big_condition
>     && big_condition)
>    one_linerdo_something;
>
>
> as awfully unreadable, but I guess code convention means you live with
> things you don't like.
>  
>
> Anyway, I've just hit this bug in the wild for the umpteenth time this
> year, and I'd like to know what I can do to help progress it to
> commit+backport.
>
>


Ask and ye shall receive. I've just committed it.

cheers

andrew

-- 
Andrew Dunstan                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "David G. Johnston"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: procedures and plpgsql PERFORM
Следующее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: procedures and plpgsql PERFORM