Re: Providing libpq explicitly

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Craig Ringer
Тема Re: Providing libpq explicitly
Дата
Msg-id CAMsr+YFjOK93eC2B7gQ-XrbDqU2nifJi3i0hvBjcc3Xe7V-xXw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Providing libpq explicitly  (Devrim Gündüz <devrim@gunduz.org>)
Ответы Re: Providing libpq explicitly  (Devrim Gündüz <devrim@gunduz.org>)
Список pgsql-pkg-yum
On 10 October 2016 at 14:44, Devrim Gündüz <devrim@gunduz.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Craig,
>
> Around Sep 2014, I committed a patch of yours that remove explicit
>
> Provides: libpq.so
>
> from the PostgreSQL RPMs, for 9.4 beta2. Do you remember the reason behind
> this?

Honestly, I don't have the foggiest anymore.

> For 3rd party apps that depend on specific version of libpq (I mean like "libpq
>>= 9.1", not libpq.so.5) are broken now. Would you mind if I put it back to the
> community RPMs?

I'd argue that such packages are simply incorrectly packaged. There's
no such thing as "libpq 9.1".

They should be using rpm's automatic library dependencies to ensure
that dependency, and shouldn't declare an explicit dependency.

--
 Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


В списке pgsql-pkg-yum по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Devrim Gündüz
Дата:
Сообщение: Providing libpq explicitly
Следующее
От: Devrim Gündüz
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Providing libpq explicitly