Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Fix drop replication slot blocking instead ofreturning error

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Craig Ringer
Тема Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Fix drop replication slot blocking instead ofreturning error
Дата
Msg-id CAMsr+YE2z-cHGa6nTMUyZZT2A2P9Jksx6bLfX30-CicboL0JFQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Fix drop replication slot blocking instead ofreturning error  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Fix drop replication slot blocking instead ofreturning error  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 29 August 2017 at 22:02, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
Hi,

On 2017-08-29 13:42:05 +0200, Simone Gotti wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> >
>
> Hi Alvaro,
>
> > Simone Gotti wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I noticed that in postgres 10beta3, calling pg_drop_replication_slot on an
> > > active slot will block until it's released instead of returning an error
> > > like
> > > done in pg 9.6. Since this is a change in the previous behavior and the docs
> > > wasn't changed I made a patch to restore the previous behavior.
> >
> > Changing that behavior was the entire point of the cited commit.
>
> Sorry, I was thinking that the new behavior was needed for internal
> future functions since the doc wasn't changed.

FWIW, I also don't think it's ok to just change the behaviour
unconditionally and without a replacement for existing behaviour.

Seems like it just needs a new argument nowait DEFAULT false
 

 Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: [HACKERS] segment size depending *_wal_size defaults (was increasing thedefault WAL segment size)