Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqSdxbmA3U2iP60P5kyBVEWZkeuP3HfR+kmRJxJYTkOTCw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 8:34 AM, Thomas Munro
<thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> It'd be nice to replace both with fls() or flsl(), though it's
> annoying to have to think about long vs int64 etc.  We already use
> fls() in two places and supply an implementation in src/port/fls.c for
> platforms that lack it (Windows?), but not the long version.

Yes, you can complain about MSVC compilation here.
-- 
Michael

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] error-handling in ReorderBufferCommit() seems somewhatbroken
Следующее
От: Craig Ringer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Fix drop replication slot blocking instead ofreturning error