Re: pg_rewarm status

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Janes
Тема Re: pg_rewarm status
Дата
Msg-id CAMkU=1ykT58EOm7vuv_jc=8D+oK85GL_E7JOgndwSEHsg+BtbA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_rewarm status  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: pg_rewarm status
Re: pg_rewarm status
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Jeff Amiel <becauseimjeff@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Trying to follow the threads and other references - but I can't determine where this patch ended up.
> (http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+TgmobRrRxCO+t6gcQrw_dJw+Uf9ZEdwf9beJnu+RB5TEBjEw@mail.gmail.com)

Well, the patch was rejected, more or less because people felt it
overlapped with pgfincore too much.  I don't particularly agree,
because pgfincore can't load data into shared buffers and doesn't work
on Windows, but other people felt differently.  There was talk of
polishing up pgfincore for possible inclusion in contrib, perhaps
adding this functionality along the way, but AFAIK there's been no
activity on that.

It wasn't rejected, it was returned with feedback with generally positive reviews.  I think the main feedback was that it should provide a single-argument overloaded function that takes just the object name and applies reasonable defaults for the remaining arguments,  for example 'main', 'buffer',NULL,NULL.   I had thought that the worry about overlap with pgfincore was mostly resolved favorably, but perhaps I misread the situation.

I'd like to see it revived for 9.4 if you are willing.

Cheers,

Jeff

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jeff Janes
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_rewarm status
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: logical changeset generation v6.8