Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions

Поиск

Список

Период

Сортировка

От	Jeff Janes
Тема	Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions
Дата	26 августа 2020 г. 20:52:17
Msg-id	CAMkU=1wdnP=+9wZ6t3fLwxD++U0YGM6TJYzQVCz+6mLzbk431g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на	Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Ответы	Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Список	pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 8:58 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:

I am planning
to push the first patch (v53-0001-Extend-the-BufFile-interface) in
this series tomorrow unless you have any comments on the same.

I'm getting compiler warnings now, src/backend/storage/file/sharedfileset.c line 288 needs to be:

bool found PG_USED_FOR_ASSERTS_ONLY = false;

Cheers,

Jeff

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

От: Fujii Masao
Дата: 26 августа 2020 г., 20:40:29
Сообщение: Re: SyncRepLock acquired exclusively in default configuration

От: Robert Haas
Дата: 26 августа 2020 г., 20:55:26
Сообщение: Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators?