Re: [HACKERS] PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operationson the same table

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Adam Brusselback
Тема Re: [HACKERS] PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operationson the same table
Дата
Msg-id CAMjNa7fqM8eRitHMfzVtXGZ_38g0kSie3MXvcWSAsJQpNs6ycA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operationson the same table  (Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
I'll give it a few days for objections before reverting.

I can only say that the lack of this feature comes up on a weekly basis on IRC, and a lot of people would be disappointed to see it reverted.

Not that my opinion matters, but I was very much looking forward to this feature in Postgres 10, but I understand if it just won't be stable enough to stay in.

I have my fingers crossed these issues can be resolved.

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Joe Conway
Дата:
Сообщение: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] BUG #14682: row level security not work with partitionedtable
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Get stuck when dropping a subscription duringsynchronizing table