Re: Costing elided SubqueryScans more nearly correctly

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Richard Guo
Тема Re: Costing elided SubqueryScans more nearly correctly
Дата
Msg-id CAMbWs4-_6tzajB98kwrrZHL8WqweC-H7woL_n9_Cz45z1J1zKQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Costing elided SubqueryScans more nearly correctly  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Costing elided SubqueryScans more nearly correctly  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения

On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 1:30 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> On 2022-Jul-18, Richard Guo wrote:
>> BTW, not related to this patch, the new lines for parallel_aware check
>> in setrefs.c are very wide. How about wrap them to keep consistent with
>> arounding codes?

> Not untrue!  Something like this, you mean?  Fixed the nearby typo while
> at it.

WFM.  (I'd fixed the comment typo in my patch, but I don't mind if
you get there first.)

+1 The fix looks good to me.

Thanks
Richard

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Masahiko Sawada
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [BUG] Logical replication failure "ERROR: could not map filenode "base/13237/442428" to relation OID" with catalog modifying txns
Следующее
От: Thomas Munro
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] Introduce array_shuffle() and array_sample()