Re: [BUG] Logical replication failure "ERROR: could not map filenode "base/13237/442428" to relation OID" with catalog modifying txns

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Masahiko Sawada
Тема Re: [BUG] Logical replication failure "ERROR: could not map filenode "base/13237/442428" to relation OID" with catalog modifying txns
Дата
Msg-id CAD21AoDfZCmjUS74t+_7j2g+MshYcp7026mufR3SRKW6XAgAHA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [BUG] Logical replication failure "ERROR: could not map filenode "base/13237/442428" to relation OID" with catalog modifying txns  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [BUG] Logical replication failure "ERROR: could not map filenode "base/13237/442428" to relation OID" with catalog modifying txns  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 1:12 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 8:09 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > This patch should have the fix for the issue that Shi yu reported. Shi
> > yu, could you please test it again with this patch?
> >
>
> Can you explain the cause of the failure and your fix for the same?

@@ -1694,6 +1788,8 @@ out:
    /* be tidy */
    if (ondisk)
        pfree(ondisk);
+   if (catchange_xip)
+       pfree(catchange_xip);

Regarding the above code in the previous version patch, looking at the
generated assembler code shared by Shi yu offlist, I realized that the
“if (catchange_xip)” is removed (folded) by gcc optimization. This is
because we dereference catchange_xip before null-pointer check as
follow:

+   /* copy catalog modifying xacts */
+   sz = sizeof(TransactionId) * catchange_xcnt;
+   memcpy(ondisk_c, catchange_xip, sz);
+   COMP_CRC32C(ondisk->checksum, ondisk_c, sz);
+   ondisk_c += sz;

Since sz is 0 in this case, memcpy doesn’t do anything actually.

By checking the assembler code, I’ve confirmed that gcc does the
optimization for these code and setting
-fno-delete-null-pointer-checks flag prevents the if statement from
being folded. Also, I’ve confirmed that adding the check if
"catchange.xcnt > 0” before the null-pointer check also can prevent
that. Adding a check  if "catchange.xcnt > 0” looks more robust. I’ve
added a similar check for builder->committed.xcnt as well for
consistency. builder->committed.xip could have no transactions.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
EDB:  https://www.enterprisedb.com/



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: System catalog documentation chapter
Следующее
От: Richard Guo
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Costing elided SubqueryScans more nearly correctly