Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)
Дата
Msg-id CAM3SWZSUwaPZ3fVTQaugDWucs4MJHBcYYWD726tiiQrwHaVE0g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Ответы Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-bugs
Дерево обсуждения 
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> Are you talking about  configurable at./configure time, or guc?

I meant a GUC. I think a ./configure option is overkill.

What about the existing caller of strxfrm(), convert_string_datum()?

--
Peter Geoghegan

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)
Следующее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)