Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)
Дата
Msg-id CAM3SWZSDVO_4tyDPgYX5NWFW=3BcCLpHV-vUtKKJ-VryqoKjVQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Список pgsql-bugs
Дерево обсуждения 
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> If I had to make a recommendation right now, I would go for your
> option #4, ie shut 'em all down Scotty.  We do not know the full extent
> of the problem but it looks pretty bad, and I think our first priority
> has to be to guarantee data integrity.

+1, but only for glibc, and configurable. The glibc default might
later be revisited in the stable 9.5 branch.

--
Peter Geoghegan

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)
Следующее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)