Re: Remove or weaken hints about "effective resolution of sleep delays is 10 ms"?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: Remove or weaken hints about "effective resolution of sleep delays is 10 ms"?
Дата
Msg-id CAM3SWZQzOOC-26ndmxAw3etUHH3A88JG=ee+ccT_Y2dTd82oMQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Remove or weaken hints about "effective resolution of sleep delays is 10 ms"?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 7:10 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Given this, I'm on board with just removing the weasel-wording about
> timer resolution, except maybe for commit_delay where useful values
> are small enough that it's a hazard on old systems.

+1, but I'd move the guidance for commit_delay's effective resolution
from "29.4. WAL Configuration" to where commit_delay is introduced,
"18.5. Write Ahead Log".


-- 
Peter Geoghegan



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: New pg_upgrade data directory inside old one?
Следующее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [DOCS] The number of bytes is stored in index_size of pgstatindex() ?