Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?
Дата
Msg-id CAM3SWZQt+f8u+8DqZ2_57k70qjEbcdb=vo16wUnTveoq7sS0=A@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> As it is, there are backup solutions which *do* check the checksum when
> backing up PG.  This is no longer, thankfully, some hypothetical thing,
> but something which really exists and will hopefully keep users from
> losing data.

Wouldn't that have issues with torn pages?


-- 
Peter Geoghegan



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Should buffer of initialization fork have aBM_PERMANENT flag