Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Stephen Frost
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?
Дата
Msg-id 20170126003008.GY9812@tamriel.snowman.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
* Peter Geoghegan (pg@heroku.com) wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> > As it is, there are backup solutions which *do* check the checksum when
> > backing up PG.  This is no longer, thankfully, some hypothetical thing,
> > but something which really exists and will hopefully keep users from
> > losing data.
>
> Wouldn't that have issues with torn pages?

No, why would it?  The page has either been written out by PG to the OS,
in which case the backup s/w will see the new page, or it hasn't been.
Our testing has not turned up any issues as yet.  That said, it's
relatively new and I wouldn't be surprised if we need to do some
adjustments in that area, which might be system-dependent even.  We
could certainly check the WAL for the page that had a checksum error (we
currently simply report them, though don't throw away a prior backup if
we detect one).

This isn't like a case where only half the page made it to the disk
because of a system failure though; everything is online and working
properly during an online backup.

Thanks!

Stephen

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?
Следующее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?