Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good
Дата
Msg-id CAM3SWZQhd0AUr=R2gUBzsEG0FEqV2zF-xVk0Rsm=SeC-mrVCog@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good  (Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>)
Ответы Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good
Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net> wrote:
>> I agree that looking for information on block level sampling
>> specifically, and its impact on estimation quality is likely to not
>> turn up very much, and whatever it does turn up will have patent
>> issues.
>
>
> We have an entire analytics dept. at work that specializes in finding
> patterns in our data. I might be able to get some time from them to at least
> provide some guidance here, if the community is interested. They could
> really only serve in a consulting role though.

I think that Greg had this right several years ago: it would probably
be very useful to have the input of someone with a strong background
in statistics. It doesn't seem that important that they already know a
lot about databases, provided they can understand what our constraints
are, and what is important to us. It might just be a matter of having
them point us in the right direction.


-- 
Peter Geoghegan



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jim Nasby
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Why we are going to have to go DirectIO
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: logical changeset generation v6.8