Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Greg Stark
Тема Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?
Дата
Msg-id CAM-w4HOR92cAqL6VgvvsPqo2mcERbumpQMzfB5+ncTsQbTsnOA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?  (David Johnston <polobo@yahoo.com>)
Ответы Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 12:27 AM, David Johnston <polobo@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> 1. FATAL:  the database system is starting up
>
> How about altering the message to tone down the severity by a half-step...
>
> FATAL: (probably) not! - the database system is starting up

Well it is fatal, the backend for that client doesn't continue.

FATAL means a backend died. It is kind of vague how FATAL and PANIC
differ. They both sound like the end of the world. If you read FATAL
thinking it means the whole service is quitting -- ie what PANIC means
-- then these sound like they're noise.


-- 
greg



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH 1/2] SSL: GUC option to prefer server cipher order
Следующее
От: David Johnston
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?