Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?
Дата
Msg-id 20131207155615.GB21734@awork2.anarazel.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?  (Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>)
Ответы Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On 2013-12-07 13:58:11 +0000, Greg Stark wrote:
> FATAL means a backend died. It is kind of vague how FATAL and PANIC
> differ.

I don't really see much vagueness there. FATAL is an unexpected but
orderly shutdown. PANIC is for the situations where we can't handle the
problem that occurred in any orderly way.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: David Johnston
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?
Следующее
От: Greg Stark
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?