Re: remove dead ports?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Greg Stark
Тема Re: remove dead ports?
Дата
Msg-id CAM-w4HOFy7UvnFUnzx-kfdQd6YrFhTzQQ9Wgr1W-VO9wWZRQ-Q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: remove dead ports?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>  I'm
> suspicious of s_lock.h's support for National Semiconductor 32K,
> Renesas' M32R, Renesas' SuperH, UNIVEL, SINIX / Reliant UNIX,
> Nextstep, and Sun3

Were there ever multiprocessor Nextstep or Sun3 machines anyways?
Wouldn't someone on these OSes want spinlocks to immediately sleep
anyways?

I did experiment a while back with getting a vax emulator going to
build postgres on it but even then I was running NetBSD.

--
greg

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Greg Stark
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 9.3: summary of corruption detection / checksums / CRCs discussion
Следующее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 9.3: summary of corruption detection / checksums / CRCs discussion