Re: 9.3: summary of corruption detection / checksums / CRCs discussion

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Josh Berkus
Тема Re: 9.3: summary of corruption detection / checksums / CRCs discussion
Дата
Msg-id 4F9753FB.2010006@agliodbs.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на 9.3: summary of corruption detection / checksums / CRCs discussion  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 4/21/12 2:40 PM, Jeff Davis wrote:
> If we do use WAL for hint bit updates, that has an impact on Hot
> Standby, because HS can't write WAL. So, it would seem that HS could not
> set hint bits.

If we're WAL-logging hint bits, then the standby would be receiving
them, so it doesn't *need* to write them.

However, I suspect that WAL-logging hint bits would be prohibitively
expensive.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Greg Stark
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: remove dead ports?
Следующее
От: Noah Misch
Дата:
Сообщение: Temporary tables under hot standby