Re: SIGFPE handler is naive

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Greg Stark
Тема Re: SIGFPE handler is naive
Дата
Msg-id CAM-w4HNDbuaKSL3-L9yZgUqKC6bpwi1jZazfLykA=8no2JHETw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: SIGFPE handler is naive  (Nils Goroll <slink@schokola.de>)
Ответы Re: SIGFPE handler is naive
Список pgsql-hackers
It is possible to check if the signal was synchronous or was sent from
an external process. You can check siginfo->si_pid to see who sent you
the signal. I'm not sure checking that and handling it at
check_for_interrupts if it's asynchronous is the best solution or not
though.

I'm a bit confused. Didn't Tom do the laborious process of checking
the whole source tree for situations where there's shared memory
cleanup to be done in and arrange for it to happen? That was the
blocking factor to get pg_cancel_backend() to work. Is the problem
that the sigfpe handler doesn't invoke atexit() handlers?

-- 
greg



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Nils Goroll
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: SIGFPE handler is naive
Следующее
От: "Kevin Grittner"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: default_isolation_level='serializable' crashes on Windows