Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 6)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Shubham Barai
Тема Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 6)
Дата
Msg-id CALxAEPttGZqmg-1Sjvdcz_CT0mugqeTvgDaN1bvgxTZMZ8Qgew@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 6)  (Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 6)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения


On 2 October 2017 at 22:21, Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Shubham Barai <shubhambaraiss@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, page-level predicate locking should happen only when fast update is off.
Actually, I forgot to put conditions in updated patch. Does everything else look ok ?

I think that isolation tests should be improved.  It doesn't seems that any posting tree would be generated by the tests that you've provided, because all the TIDs could fit the single posting list.  Note, that you can get some insight into GIN physical structure using pageinspect contrib.


I have created new isolation tests. Please have a look at
updated patch.

Regards,
Shubham
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Better testing coverage and unified coding for plpgsql loops
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support